Judge Perkins Refuses to Apply Law and Statutes Enacted by Legislature and Approved by the Governor of Minnesota…

Banken vs. Banken / Carver County, MN / Judge Richard Perkins / Banken children ages 1, 5 and 7

Minnesota Statutes § 518.17 was enacted into law by the Minnesota legislature and approved by the governor. It requires the judicial branch of Minnesota to apply the criteria set forth in the statute in determining who gets custody of children in family litigation. But Judge Richard Perkins has ignored this statute and refuses to apply it. His August 5, 2011 judgment makes no determination on custody. In a separate August 5, 2011 “order on Motions” Judge Perkins gave father “temporary” sole custody of the children and gave mother only “supervised” visitation with the children. The restrictions on mother have deprived her of any visitation with her children. In over seven months, she has had no visitation with her children. There have been no hearings. No findings of fact. No basis at all for depriving mother of all contact with her children except for the publication of her blog on the internet which Judge Perkins demands that mother take down and end all posts to that blog – a blatant violation of mother’s right of free speech under the U.S. and Minnesota Constitutions. Judge Perkins has completely ignored and refused to apply any of the criteria specified in Minn. Stat. § 518.17. He is thumbing his nose at the legislative and executive branches of Minnesota’s government. He is acting like a dictator in disregarding the law and doing whatever he wants in court. In so doing his behavior is uncivilized, insensitive, savage and barbaric. He has and is seriously damaging three children in allowing them to be molested and depriving them of contact with their mother. He has destroyed the formation of a bond between the infant daughter of the parties and her mother – a permanent injury. Judge Perkins has no conscience. He is drunk with power.

In his August 5, 2011 judgment, Judge Perkins ignored and refused to apply Minnesota Statutes § 518.58, which governs property distribution in family litigation. Judge Perkins awarded mother nothing. None of the parties money, assets, property, and no part of the equity in the marital homestead. He ordered mother to move out of the marital home on two week’s notice even though she had no place to go. He further ordered that mother was indebted to father in an amount over $40,000.00 and assessed mother sanctions amounting to thousands of dollars for contempt of his orders and for attorney’s fees for father, a wealthy business owner. He totally disregarded Minn. Stat. § 518.58, which states in part:

[T]he court shall make a just and equitable division of the marital property of the parties without regard to marital misconduct, after making findings regarding the division of the property. The court shall base its findings on all relevant factors including the length of the marriage, any prior marriage of a party, the age, health, station, occupation, amount and sources of income, vocational skills, employability, estate, liabilities, needs, opportunity for future acquisition of capital assets, and income of each party. The court shall also consider the contribution of each in the acquisition, preservation, depreciation or appreciation in the amount or value of the marital property, as well as the contribution of a spouse as a homemaker. It shall be conclusively presumed that each spouse made a substantial contribution to the acquisition of income and property while they were living together as husband and wife. The court may also award to either spouse the household goods and furniture of the parties, whether or not acquired during the marriage. The court shall value marital assets for purposes of division between the parties as of the day of the initially scheduled prehearing settlement conference, unless a different date is agreed upon by the parties, or unless the court makes specific findings that another date of valuation is fair and equitable. If there is a substantial change in value of an asset between the date of valuation and the final distribution, the court may adjust the valuation of that asset as necessary to effect an equitable distribution. (Emphasis added)

Judge Perkins violated the statute in several particulars including giving mother nothing for her contribution as a homemaker and disregarding the conclusive presumption that mother made a “substantial contribution” to the acquisition of income and property. Judge Perkins again thumbed his nose at the legislature and an enacted statute approved by the governor.

Mother is engaged in an appeal of the outrageous judgment of Judge Perkins. She has no money. Absolutely nothing. Literally, she cannot afford the assistance of counsel in her appeal. Father, a wealthy business owner, who has paid and is paying substantial amounts to his attorney, easily can provide funds for mother to use in obtaining counsel and helping to level the playing field. Basic fairness demands that she get this assistance.

Mother has been evaluated more than once by licensed professionals and found to be normal and well qualified to parent her children. A fair and proper finding on permanent custody requires that father also be evaluated by an independent, responsible evaluator selected or approved by mother. This is for the children’s protection.

This is a small part of the letter being composed to explain the horrid way in which these children and mother have been treated by Judge Perkins of Carver County, MN… 

About these ads
, , , , ,

About ncpp

ncpp: National Coalition for Protective Parents Exposing Corruption in Carver County Minnesota Family Court/CPS and Foster Care System. Government Abuse IS Child Abuse for Profit. We The People... are no longer tolerating; TAXPAYER dollars (billions) used to separate, and financially demolish families.

View all posts by ncpp


Subscribe to our RSS feed and social profiles to receive updates.

8 Comments on “Judge Perkins Refuses to Apply Law and Statutes Enacted by Legislature and Approved by the Governor of Minnesota…”

  1. KTG Says:

    This judge is going down. Think its possible for him to revamp his reputation? Not likely. Google his name once, it is horror story after horror story. Way to go Judge Perkins, keep securing your own demise! We love it! No way do we want you to continue overseeing our children and families.


  2. Amy Says:

    We need bumper stickers made, Impeach Judge Perkins! Sounds like he got enough money to retire with all his winnings off forcing kids into abuse.


  3. Bonnie Says:

    Post on January 14th well said.. I feel the legislators/senators and those in authority need to know how these judges are violating the rules that were set for them to abide by! ACCOUNTABLITY


    • Anon Says:

      Regarding legislative accountability, we need to make this an election issue–senators/reps who won’t listen, who won’t act, won’t get reelected. Post who is helping, who isn’t.


  4. Cee Says:

    Was there some sort of prenuptial agreement? It is just unreal that this judge would leave the Banken mother penniless. That is so wrong! Even worse, preventing a mother and her young children from seeing each other for seven months is just so cruel. I’m praying that there is justice.


  5. Sergeant US Army Says:

    This is not to be allowed. I did not fight for this country so some nitwit could abuse our laws – the very laws I fought to protect. Someone expunge this judge before he finds more victims. Same goes for that degenerate lawyer, Chris Banas, and all the rest of the adversary. This is an insult to what we do, and what we stand for!


  6. Sergeant US Army Says:

    Even more important: the kids. Get them out of the hands of these vile creatures- creatures undeserving of raising themselves as adults, furthermore children! Every day that goes by is illogically damaging to these kids. There is no reason for this to continue.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: